Lifelong Learning Programme

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
This material reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein

Also available in:


Homepage > Databases > Publications


back to the list

Document Typology: Research
Methodology addressed by the publication:Parents pedagogy
Title of document: A comparison of doctors', parents' and children's reports of health states and health-related quality of life in children with chronic conditions.
Name of author(s): Morrow, A. M., Hayen, Quine, Scheinberg, Craig, J.
Name of publisher: Child: Care, Health & Development; Mar2012, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p186-195, 10p
Language of the publication: English
Language of the review: English
Background Health-related quality of life is an important outcome. Self-report is the gold standard, but in the paediatric setting we often rely on proxy reporting. Our understanding of the differences between self- and proxy reports and the factors that influence them is limited. These differences can impact on treatment choices and the patient-doctor relationship. Objective To evaluate differences between children's, parents' and doctors' perceptions of health states and health-related quality of life in children with chronic illness and explore factors which explain these differences. Methods Consecutive families attending eligible clinics at a tertiary paediatric centre were invited to complete the Health Utilities Index (HUI) 23 questionnaire. Percentage agreement and kappas were calculated as a measure of the agreement between pairs. Chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact test, if appropriate, were performed to determine if there was an association between level of agreement and participant variables. Results Data were collected for 130 parent-doctor pairs, 59 child-parent pairs and 59 child-doctor pairs. Overall health-related quality of life scores did not differ between responders, but there was poorer agreement for subjective domains. Doctor-child agreement was lower than parent-child agreement. Children with a diagnosis of cerebral palsy or chronic neurological condition were more likely to have lower inter-rater agreement for both subjective and objective domains. On the HUI2, agreement was lower for parent-child pairs when the father was the respondent. For child-doctor pairs, an increased frequency of patient-doctor visits and doctors' seniority were predictors of poorer agreement on the HUI3 and HUI2 respectively. Conclusions We identified factors associated with level of agreement for self- and proxy reporting on the HUI23. Parent-child agreement was higher than doctor-child agreement. Patients with significant pain or emotional distress and patients with a diagnosis of severe cerebral palsy or chronic neurological conditions were more susceptible to under-reporting of subjective aspects of well-being by doctors and parents and may benefit from formal assessment of health-related quality of life in the clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Child: Care, Health & Development is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Reviewer's comments on the document:
It is a march 2012 article and it is focused on the quality of life.
The self report is gold standard but non used in the pediatric settings
Where to find it:

Education Research Complete Author Affiliations 1Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead 2School of Public Health, University of Sydney 3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney 4Victorian Paediatric Rehabilitation Service at Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

back to the list